What Does “Bad Bunny Sued” Mean?
When news breaks that Bad Bunny Sued headlines appear, it refers to recent legal actions filed against the Puerto Rican superstar Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio — better known as Bad Bunny — alleging misuse of voice recordings and other rights.
Why Was Bad Bunny Sued?
Voice Recording Dispute (Primary Lawsuit)
In January 2026, Bad Bunny was sued in Puerto Rico by a woman named Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera. She claims that her voice appears — without permission — on two of his songs:
-
“Solo de Mi” from X100PRE (2018)
-
“EoO” from Debí Tirar Más Fotos (2025)
Rivera alleges that the voice sample saying “Mira, puñeta, no me quiten el perreo” was recorded back in 2018 for Bad Bunny’s producer when they were theater students, but she never signed a contract nor gave authorization for commercial use. She also says the recording has been used in concerts, merchandise, streaming, and other promotions.
She is seeking $16 million in damages, arguing violations of her privacy rights and “publicity rights” under Puerto Rican law.
This latest case made headlines with multiple news outlets reporting on it.
What Happened — Timeline of the Lawsuit
-
Recording Origin (2018):
Rivera recorded the phrase at the behest of Bad Bunny’s future producer while they were students. -
Commercial Release:
The audio was used later on hit songs like Solo de Mi and EoO without a clear agreement or contract confirming Rivera’s rights or compensation. -
Filing the Lawsuit:
In early January 2026, she filed the legal complaint in Puerto Rico, seeking $16 million in damages and raising claims that go beyond just credit — including the right to compensation for global uses of the recording. -
Bad Bunny’s Team:
The lawsuit names not only Bad Bunny, but also his label Rimas Entertainment and the producer allegedly involved in the original recorded clip.
Who Sued Bad Bunny?
Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera
The most recent lawsuit was filed by Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera, who says she never agreed to commercialize her voice recording and now wants compensation based on how widely it has been used.
She is represented by the same legal team that previously filed a separate lawsuit against Bad Bunny in 2023 — that case involved claims from his ex-girlfriend about the use of a different voice tag without permission.
Other Legal Actions (Context)
Although the current $16 million suit is the major recent case, Bad Bunny has faced other legal claims in recent years — including a reported lawsuit from a homeowner overthe use of his house in music videos and residency sets.
What Bad Bunny and Reactions Say
So far, neither Bad Bunny nor his representatives have publicly commented on the specific voice recording lawsuit. Legal proceedings are expected to continue through 2026 as both sides build their cases.
Fans and online communities have shared mixed reactions, with many debating the fairness of sample clearance practices in modern music.
What Happens Next?
With court dates expected in 2026 and potential negotiations ahead, this lawsuit remains ongoing. Legal experts say cases about voice rights, publicity rights, and unauthorized use can take months or years to resolve, with possible settlements before trial.
FAQs
Why is Bad Bunny Sued?
Bad Bunny was sued because a woman alleges her voice was used without permission in two songs and related promotions.
How much is the lawsuit seeking?
The plaintiff is seeking $16 million in damages.
Who sued Bad Bunny?
The lawsuit was filed by Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera, who claims unauthorized voice use.
Is this the only lawsuit against him?
Bad Bunny has faced other legal claims, including disputes over property use and previous voice-related lawsuits.
